Self-Organizing Agent Teams Learn to Reason Together
Frozen teams learn reusable coordination strategies, with gains depending partly on their ability to recognize correct reasoning.
A living reading list / Ashish Makani
Better questions. Reliable discoveries.
Human agency at the center.
I want a future in which AI agents help people ask better questions, explore more possibilities and turn reliable discoveries into benefits that reach more people. Science and mathematics offer extraordinary opportunities for this kind of collaboration, especially in medicine and biology, where better understanding can ultimately mean less suffering and more healthy life. I am interested in human–AI teams and collaborations across laboratories around the world, with each contributing strengths the others lack.
Progress should deepen human agency and meaning: the freedom to choose what matters, understand the work, challenge an answer and share in discovery. That means evaluating evidence rather than just fluent output, preserving uncertainty and giving people real authority over consequential decisions. It also means designing against accidental harm and deliberate misuse, taking dual-use risks seriously, and making the benefits of scientific capability broadly accessible.
Papers, perspectives & conversations
Dates are first public posting/publication where verified; talks use upload dates. Year-only dates retain their original precision. OP means an original author/team post or identified commentary. Missing posts are marked as unverified. Inclusion means worth thinking about, not endorsement. External links open in a new tab.
Frozen teams learn reusable coordination strategies, with gains depending partly on their ability to recognize correct reasoning.
An autonomous research pipeline combines experiments, ablations and simulated peer review; its reported successes require careful attention to selection and evaluation.
Combines model-use data, a specialist-model inventory and a researcher survey to examine adoption, time savings and verification demands.
Describes infrastructure for long scientific tool runs, specialized models and efficient training; performance claims come from the company.
Six researchers reflect on cancer biology, translational disappointments and opportunities for human–AI co-science.
Describes medical researchers integrating specialized AI agents with vetted data, laboratory workflows and human oversight.
François Chollet highlights latent iterations alongside longer reasoning and parallel exploration.
Eunice Jun explores representations and interfaces that make scientific reasoning more inspectable.
Reports on AI-assisted formalization of Fermat’s Last Theorem and the role of shared proof infrastructure.
Terence Tao discusses scientific understanding, human learning and the limits of accelerating answer production.
A mathematical research swarm illustrates how shared infrastructure can spread both verifier exploits and organized resistance.
Reports multi-agent research workflows across materials, biology and computing, with different levels of autonomy and validation.
Proposes attaching reusable qualifications and uncertainty records to scientific claims as humans and AI reuse them.
Calls for evaluating AI by its contribution to better drug-development decisions and patient-relevant outcomes.
Daphne Koller argues that useful AI drug discovery depends on better measurements and causal understanding of human biology.
Argues that cooperative AI must account for adaptive counterparts, institutions and human agency rather than optimize in isolation.
Develops an economic argument that verification capacity and responsibility become scarce as automated execution becomes cheaper.
Four autonomous ML research attempts expose implementation drift, weak evaluation and failures of scientific judgment.
Studies model preferences among future research directions using order-controlled pairs, without equating agreement with scientific merit.
No resources match these filters. Try a broader search or clear the filters.